Home

Publications
Implementing APM
Designing the Process for Selecting a Site
Building Knowledge
Technical Research
Social Research & Dialogue
Citizen Panels Program
Input to Design of Site Selection Process - Multi-Party Dialogues
Input to Design of Site Selection Process - Report on Nation-Wide survey
Input to Design of Site Selection Process - E-Dialogues
Input to Design of Site Selection Process - Background Papers
Exploring the Concept of "Community Well-being"
Exploring Communication Effectiveness
Exploring the Concept of Risk
Economic Benefits Linked to APM
Research Support Program
Ethical and Social Framework
Review of Proposed Design for Site Selection Process - Citizens Panel Dialogues
Review of Proposed Design for Site Selection Process - Public Information Sessions
Review of Proposed Design for Site Selection Process - Multi-Party Dialogues
Review of Proposed Design for Site Selection Process - Report on Nation-Wide Survey
Review of Proposed Design for Site Selection Process - E-Dialogues
International Cooperation and Research
Aboriginal Engagement
Implementation Plans
What We Heard: Reports on Engagement Activities
Adaption: Review, Adjust and Validate Plans
Municipal Engagement
Youth Engagement
Being Discussed
 

 

Working Within An Ethical and Social Framework

After ten years of study and public hearings on the concept of deep geological disposal of used nuclear fuel (1989 - 1998), an Environmental Assessment Panel chaired by Blair Seaborn (the "Seaborn Panel") concluded in their 1998 report that the concept did not have sufficient public support to allow the government to proceed. The Panel identified the absence of any ethical and social framework within which to assess options as an important issue.

 

From its inception, the NWMO has committed itself to adhering to the highest ethical standards both in its procedures and in its assessment of management options. To guide it in this matter, the NWMO created a Round Table on Ethics in 2003. Its members were Georges Erasmus, one of the most reflective and experienced aboriginal leaders in Canada, David MacDonald, senior United Church minister and former federal cabinet minister, Andrew Brook, a philosopher with over 30 years of experience in the ethics of nuclear waste management, and three of Canada's most senior ethicists, Wesley Cragg, Arthur Schafer, and Margaret Somerville. The Roundtable concluded its work in late 2005.

 

As part of its mandate, the Round Table identified what the relevant ethical standards are, in its judgment, and organized them into the Ethical and Social Framework called for by the Seaborn report. Rather than issue what could appear to be dogmatic statements, the Framework expresses the ethical standards concerned as a series of questions for the NWMO to ask itself. The Framework was first published by the NWMO in April, 2004. A revised version was published in 2005. In December 2011 the Framework was reviewed for its continued appropriateness to guide new phases of NWMO’s work. The framework is intended to be a living document. We invite your thoughts and comments. 

 

 

Review of the framework (December 2011)

Ethical and Social Framework (Version: March 5, 2005)

Ethical and Social Framework (Version: June 24 2004)

Add your thoughts

 

 

Exploring Ethics During the Study (2002 – 2005)

Social and Ethical Dimensions

Round Table on Ethics

 

 

 
     

Annual Report 2012


Backgrounder


Site Selection Process

 


 

 

Contact Us
Nuclear Waste Management Organization
22 St. Clair Avenue East, Sixth Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M4T 2S3 Canada
Tel: 416.934.9814
Toll Free: 1.866.249.6966
Fax: 416.934.9526
Email: contactus@nwmo.ca

 

 

SITEMAP
TERMS OF USE
PRIVACY NOTICE
CONTACT US

May-21-2013 09:57:16 AM EDT

© 2010 Nuclear Waste Management Organization