Peer review

One way we ensure our work is based on the best science is by working with leading scientists and experts from universities, in the industry or as part of international research groups.
    A photo of a environmental studies team on a waterfront.

    Environmental Review Group

    The Environmental Review Group advises the NWMO on developing an effective impact assessment process, including engagement and the interweaving of Indigenous Knowledge and western science, as well as international best practices.
    Read more
    The GRG is made up of five internationally recognized experts from Canada, Sweden, Switzerland, and Australia. They possess extensive multidisciplinary experience relevant to the siting of a deep geological repository.

    Geoscientific Review Group

    The NWMO established the Geoscientific Review Group to ensure site evaluations are conducted in a consistent and traceable manner using international best practices.
    Read more

    Safety Assessment Review Group

    The Safety Assessment Review Group was established in 2023. It is made up of a group of four internationally recognized experts in safety case and safety assessments from Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.

    The group provides expert advice and guidance to ensure that safety assessments are conducted in a manner consistent with best international practices. The group reviews and provides recommendations on the development of the safety case, as well as the approach, methods and results of the pre-closure and post-closure safety assessment studies and reports produced to support the regulatory decision-making process for the used nuclear fuel repository.

    Community-Based Transportation Working Group

    The NWMO established the Community-Based Transportation Working Group to seek feedback from a broad range of individuals across Ontario, Québec and New Brunswick about how to implement the organization’s transportation planning framework, including collaborative transportation planning and engagement and dialogue for the transportation program. The members of the working group are individuals acting as independent advisors.

    Site Selection Review Group

    The Site Selection Review Group was comprised of two internationally respected members from different professional backgrounds. These review group members had knowledge and experience in nuclear waste-related siting processes and international best practices.

    The group provided independent advice and guidance on the NWMO’s final site selection approach for a deep geological repository for used nuclear fuel. Its purpose was to ensure the decision-making process was reasonable, comprehensive, credible and rigorous. Its mandate was completed in 2024.

    The members of the Site Selection Review Group were:

    • Tom Isaacs, chair of the Site Selection Review Group, lead advisor on the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future and senior advisor to the Nuclear Threat Initiative.
    • Claes Thegerström, former president of the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company.

    Each of the members was independent of the NWMO, the site selection process and the municipal and Indigenous communities involved in the process.

    Scientific journal reviews

    The NWMO regularly undergoes independent peer reviews when publishing technical research results in scientific journals and at conferences. On specific topics, we seek out peer reviews or request that state-of-science reviews be prepared by leading experts.

    Continue reading

    An icon showing people

    Review groups

    Independent Technical Review Group
    An icon showing people

    Who we are

    How we're governed